| 49 | 0 | 60 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 分析食管癌患者行调强适行放疗(IMRT)的疗效和发生急性放射性肺损伤(ARILI)的风险因素,并构建相关的回归模型。方法 收集2021年1月至2024年6月河南科技大学第一附属医院收治的312例行IMRT的食管癌患者的临床病历资料,根据其放疗后随访6个月是否发生ARILI分为发生组(53例,RTOG分级1~4级)和未发生组(259例,RTOG分级0级)。分析两组患者疗效、不良反应发生情况,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析影响食管癌患者IMRT发生ARILI的因素,并构建模型。结果 312例患者IMRT结束后,完全缓解245例(78.53%),部分缓解61例(19.55%),无缓解6例(1.92%),总缓解率为98.08%;发生放射性食管炎29例(9.29%)、ARILI53例(16.99%)、骨髓抑制31例(9.94%)、胃肠道反应15例(4.81%)。与未发生ARILI组比较,发生组放疗总剂量≥60 Gy、淋巴结转移的患者占比更高,肺V5、肺V10、肺V20、肺V30、全肺平均剂量(MLD)、血清白介素(IL)-8、转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)水平均更高(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肺V5>50%、肺V20>25%、肺V30>20%、血清IL-8水平偏高、血清TGF-β1水平偏高均为食管癌患者IMRT后发生ARILI的危险因素(OR=1.608、2.523、2.087、1.020、1.014,P<0.05)。据此构建回归方程:Logit(P)=-109.606+肺V5×0.475+肺V20×0.925+肺V30×0.736+血清IL-8水平×0.019+血清TGF-β1水平×0.014。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)结果显示,当logit(P)>0.20时,曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.999,95%CI为0.997~1.000,敏感度为100.00%,特异度为98.84%。结论 食管癌患者行IMRT的效果良好,安全性一般,食管癌患者行IMRT发生ARILI的危险因素为肺V5>50%、肺V20>25%、肺V30>20%、血清IL-8水平偏高、血清TGF-β1水平偏高,由此建立的模型对符合上述特点的患者可以采取有针对性的治疗和干预措施,帮助改善患者预后。
Abstract:Objective To analyze the efflcacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) in patients with esophageal cancer and the risk factors of acute radiation-induced lung injury(ARILI), and to construct the relevant regression model. Methods The clinical medical records of 312 esophageal cancer patients who underwent IMRT and were admitted to the first afflliated hospital of Henan university of science and technology from January 2021 to June 2024 were collected as the research objects. They were divided into the occurrence group(53 cases, RTOG grades 1-4) and the non-occurrence group(259 cases) based on whether ARILI occurred during the 6-month follow-up after radiotherapy. RTOG grade 0. The therapeutic effects and the occurrence of adverse reactions of the two groups of patients were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the factors influencing the occurrence of ARILI in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing IMRT, and a model was constructed. Results Among the 312 patients after IMRT, 245 cases(78.53%) achieved complete remission, 61 cases(19.55%) achieved partial remission, 6 cases(1.92%) had no remission, and the total remission rate was 98.08%. There were 29 cases(9.29%) of radiation esophagitis, 53 cases(16.99%) of ARILI, 31 cases(9.94%) of bone marrow suppression, and 15 cases(4.81%) of gastrointestinal reactions. Compared with the group without ARILI, the proportion of patients with a total radiotherapy dose of ≥60 Gy and lymph node metastasis was higher in the group with ARILI, and the levels of lung V5, lung V10, lung V20, lung V30, average lung dose(MLD), serum interleukin(IL)-8, and transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) were all higher(P<0.05). The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that Lung V5>50%, lung V20>25%, lung V30>20%, elevated serum IL-8 level, and elevated serum TGF-β1 level are all risk factors for ARILI in patients with esophageal cancer after IMRT(OR=1.608, 2.523, 2.087, 1.020, 1.014, P<0.05). Based on this, a regression equation was constructed: logit(P) =-109.606+ lung V5×0.475+ lung V20×0.925+ lung V30×0.736+ serum IL-8 level ×0.019+ serum TGF-β1 level ×0.014. The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) showed that when Logit(P) >0.20, the area under the curve(AUC) value was 0.999, the 95%CI was 0.997 to 1.000, the sensitivity was 100.00%, and the specificity was 98.84%. Conclusion The effect of IMRT in patients with esophageal cancer is good, but the safety is average. The risk factors for ARILI in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing IMRT are lung V5>50%, lung V20>25%, lung V30>20%, high serum IL-8 level, and high serum TGF-β1 level. The model established in this way can take targeted treatment and intervention measures for patients who meet the above characteristics, helping to improve the prognosis of patients.
[1]Filho AM, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, et al. The GLOBOCAN 2022cancer estimates:Data sources, methods, and a snapshot of the cancer burden worldwide[J]. Int J Cancer, 2025,156(7):1336-1346.
[2]Wei T H , Zhang S , Liu Y Y , et al. Evaluation of the clinical effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer:a comparative study[J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 2025, 30(1):287-287.
[3]Xu L , Wang B , Wang C , et al. A model of basement membrane-related regulators for prediction of prognoses in esophageal cancer and verification in vitro[J]. BMC Cancer, 2025, 25(1):696-696.
[4]赵彦,祝淑钗,沈文斌,等. C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值对老年食管鳞癌放疗患者预后的预测价值[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2021,26(5):437-442.
[5]朱金峰,何志杰,张涛,等.基于螺旋断层放疗的模块化挽救方案在复发转移食管癌治疗中的应用研究[J].临床医学工程,2025,32(10):1077-1082.
[6]中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. C S C O食管癌诊疗指南(2025)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2025:82-99.
[7]Kachnic LA, Winter K, Suntharalingam M, et al. Patient-reported outcomes(PROs)in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436:a phaseⅢtrial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery[J]. Qual Life Res,2024,33(10):2833-2844.
[8]张旭婷,任基伟,楚琳,等.宝石能谱CT成像在食管癌术前分期和病理分级预测中的价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2023,21(12):82-84.
[9]Yang T , He Y. Ultrasound image-based paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia in laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer[J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2025,23(1):136-136.
[10]Yang R , Shi Z , Ruan J , et al. Application of peritumoral radiomics based on simulated positioning CT images in the prognosis of intermediate-advanced esophageal cancer[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025,15(1):11865-11865.
[11]Yu N , Wan Y , Zuo L , et al. Multi-modal radiomics features to predict overall survival of locally advanced esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy[J]. BMC Cancer, 2025, 25(1):596-596.
[12]黄磊,程东苗,吴迪,等.食管癌适形调强放疗病人预后多因素回归分析及其预测模型构建[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2022,47(8):1030-1033,1037.
[13]王延虎,肖韡,方申存,等.预测食管癌调强适形放疗致急性放射性皮炎的列线图模型的建立与验证[J].实用临床医药杂志,2023,27(1):26-30,59.
[14]葛宁,刘浩武,康亚辉,等.食管癌术后调强放疗致放射性胃炎的影响因素分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2020,45(8):1004-1007.
[15]宋叶娜,叶大娟.食管癌调强放疗下发生急性放射肺损伤的列线图预测模型构建与评估[J].解剖学研究,2022,44(3):229-234,239.
[16]颜世娇,丁莉莉,李伟.非小细胞肺癌患者调强适形放疗致急性放射性肺损伤风险列线图模型的建立及验证[J].临床肺科杂志,2024,29(8):1187-1192.
[17]汪瑞,魏本飞.食管癌调强放疗并同步化疗后的初期疗效分析及发生急性放射性肺损伤的危险因素研究[J].中国现代医生,2022,60(27):71-75.
[18]王俐,戴安伟,李张艳,等.老年食管癌患者调强放疗效果及发生放射性肺炎因素分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2023,46(2):128-131.
[19]周瑜,张延军,王勇强,等.食管癌三维适形和调强放射治疗中肿瘤靶区移位及对放疗剂量学的影响分析[J].医药前沿,2025,15(3):1-3+7.
[20]黄晓雨,陈其威,叶静雅,等.基于决策曲线分析血清IGF-1、IL-8水平与不可切除食管癌患者诱导化疗序贯放化疗预后的关系[J].疑难病杂志,2022,21(4):338-343.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R735.1
引用信息:
[1]侯鹏,朱小娟,韩亚龙.食管癌调强适行放疗疗效及安全性的临床观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2025,30(12):1199-1203.
基金信息:
河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目(LHGJ20190546)
2025-12-28
2025-12-28